Unemployment in Massachusetts: What's your Problem?
by Dave Atkins
Tweet This
My posts on unemployment in Massachusetts have drawn commentary here and attention from the media and government. A producer from WBUR called me last week to set up a panel discussion on Friday where I will join an economist and the Commonwealth's Secretary of Labor and Workforce Development, Suzanne Bump to talk about the situation in Massachusetts and respond to listeners who call in with questions. I've also been talking with a staffer at that agency, where they have started a blog about jobs and unemployment.
Follow up:
I would like to invite people to post questions here...to relate their experiences...to say things you would like me to think about while I'm on this radio show. I can't answer specific personal detail questions, but it would help to be able to pass along the kind of real questions and stories that people have.
When I talked to Secretary Bump in person after the Town Hall Meeting, I learned a few things:
- The reason initial claims are not online is due to the complexity and age of the existing system--which is being overhauled. Now, I still don't understand why a simple web submission form could be deployed, but I did not get into all the details with her...
- My situation is not typical. Many people have complicated claims where they did not work for the same employer all year or their employer disputes their eligibility, etc. The claims process is much more complicated for many than it was for me, so it is a mistake to assume everyone's situation is simple.
Update: As I was writing this post, I noticed a tweet from my friend Rachel Levy, who was also interviewed by WBUR and quoted in a post just now. It does make me pause to ask myself why I am putting myself out there and whether I'm developing an unintentional brand as "celebrity unemployed." Does this press help or hurt me?
I don't know. What I do know is that dozens of people have contacted me about my blog posts and have asked me questions I'm not qualified to answer regarding benefits. I do know that I spent a lot of time and frustration on the phone and I believe there are ways to solve these problems. I am excited that my writing about these solutions has drawn the attention of the media and people in our state agencies who have the power and resources to do something about it. So I keep doing it. I feel like there are thousands of people who feel no one is listening to them and if I get the attention of somebody, I should make the most of it.
13 comments
That way the focus of attention becomes your knowledge of a system (MA bureaucracy, for example) or expertise in a skill set (social media, eg) which differentiate you, instead of being out of work and searching for a job, which does not.
You're doing a great job of self-marketing and PR -- just be cognizant that you're promoting the product (you) in the proper light.
Just today I waited on the phone for 30 minutes, spoke to an agent for a few minutes and then had her say "I need to go" and hang up without even a goodbye or "I'm sorry but.." I was not asking ridiculous questions, I was not complaining about the unemployment process, I was not impolite, I was simply trying to understand a complicated process. The answers to my questions were not online -- I spent hours looking.
Furthermore, our conversation could have been much shorter had she not consistently interrupted me and/or felt the need to correct me on every piece of unemployment jargon that I used incorrectly -- aka I need to talk to a teleclaims "agent" rather then a "person" at teleclaims.
I understand these folks are stressed, but I don't think a rude attitude helps anyone. How is the EOLWD's attitude of really helping/reaching out to constituents filtering down to the day to day employees -- or is it not at all.
I'm ineligible for Unemployment Insurance here in Massachusetts because I am just getting out of school. I have no 'base period' of wages to draw upon. I'm also a white male with no children, so I am not eligible for any other help- state or federal. I am supposed to just die off. There isn't even temp work available in Boston!
Is Obama going to help this, or will the unemployment rate just continue to be under-represented (only shown as number of those claiming UI benefits)?
I'd love some help, but I'm not holding my breath.
I believe if that personal story could be told authentically and transparently, those in authority could marshall true power to achieve change. But until that day, communication will be managed...and mediocrity and the status quo tolerated as inevitable.
they told me i was eligible for compensation as of n0v.15 2009.
How long should i be waiting?
I have been laid off since May as and Engineer and it is the first time I have ever collected UI in my life. I am veteran who also served time in Afghanistan and Iraq working for the Army as a civilian contractor. The reason why I note these things is because I have always been proud to be a productive member of society, do the right thing, and to contribute to our society.
My experience with unemployment though has left me very bitter and disturbed. When I was laid off I looked for work right away but found there was nothing out there in my field, so I decided to finish the one semester I had left to complete my degree. I used the GI Bill I had earned from my military service to pay for school, I could of got money from the State but felt that would be exploiting the system since the GI Bill covered all my expenses. I was told by an UI agent that I could work part-time to supplement my UI so I started working as a Dishwasher at a Restaurant 30 min from where I live.
In November I found out my Mother who lives in NJ was diagnosed with Stage 4 Lung Cancer. I took a leave of absense from my part time job so I could travel back and forth from here to NJ, finish school, and continue to look for a Full Time Job in my field. I came back 6 weeks later for one week then quit because I was finished school and wanted to fully concentrate on finding a full time position in my field.
I was told by UI that I was disqualified from collecting UI during the period of my LOA and from the point I quit the part time job. I don't understand why. I was trying to do the right thing when I was laid off by going back to school and making sure I never had to go back on UI again.
What really disturbs me is that if I never had taken that part time job, I would still be collecting. It seems the system is set up to reward people for not working and not trying to better themselves and get off the Government rolls. When I talk to people about it, most suggest that I should of lied to UI.
I called my state senator and asked for help, his staff said they would call UI but I don't think I will get any relief.
Bottom line is this, I used to defend the idea of Government Programs for those who need help, until I actually had use them and realized that it is designed reward dependency on Government and punish those who are trying to use it to get back on their feet and off the Government Rolls.
Any Suggestions?
Thank You
Dan Lahey
Ok, I feel like I'm in a bureaucratic, Kafka-esque nightmare and am wondering if anyone has any insights.
I owned my own business for over 10 years and closed in August. I paid contributions for myself and for my employees (who are now collecting).
Can anyone tell me if I am eligible to file myself (granted, I only made about 20K in 2009 since cash was tight).
Can I apply for UI? And do I have health insurance assistance avaiable to me?
The big problem every agent has is they don't know what to say when I say I owned the business. UGH!!!
Thanks,
Mark






04/15/09 12:12:30 am, 
Recent comments